A HISTORICAL REVIEW OF BRITISH ART 1900-1940:PART 3.

(c) Tate; Supplied by The Public Catalogue Foundationuntitlednash

s-l225

In the 3rd part of my review of British art I will be considering the important influence of Paul Nash who I have reviewed before and is featured in a exhibition at Tate Britain. His importance cannot be overstated as Frances Spalding  recognises.

” One artist who played a significant role during the early 1930’s was Paul Nash. he first saw a substantial collection of contemporary French and Italian art while painting in Paris en route to Toulon”. [1].

” Aware of a trend towards abstraction he himself experimented with this style between 1929-1931 eventually  realising that it was ill suited to his interests and temperament”. [2].

Spalding in her further commentary on Nash shows that he remained a Landscape painter of some importance.

” He remained primarily a landscape artist though he abstracted and remoulded nature according to his needs”.[3].

” The issue of abstract art grew more divisive as the decade progressed”. [4].

82_1

205

4473bd51b4c75c358b97fa2e7ef96000-nash_wood_downs-e1403259565235

b041e1e98179cdf8ff9af59e252b7998

Landscape from a Dream 1936-8 by Paul Nash 1889-1946

untitledpaul-nash

39499-0c4b1852a8caf6fc92d2e7f15dede73b

Spalding now discusses Unit 1 which was formed By Nash and others.

” It undermined abstraction the cohesiveness   of unit one a group of 11 artists whose existence was announced by Paul Nash in a letter to the Times on 2nd June 1933″.[5].

”  The 11 members included Nash , Moore Wadsworth , Coates Hepworth and Ben Nicholson , Burra and others”.[6].

Nicholson was responsible for the first abstract Exhibition which came to Britain.

” The same year saw the first abstract Exhibition in England. It was engineered by Ben Nicholson”. [7].

” It was during this decade that Ben Nicholson was able to concentrate in his art a number of crucial experiences. He had first recognised  the abstract potential of colour in 1921 when on a visit to Paul Rosenberg’s gallery where he saw Picasso”.[8].

nash_eclipse_of_sunflower_0

8e246a9387c470a7cb2986359be46bb4

Equivalents for the Megaliths 1935 by Paul Nash 1889-1946

 

Voyages of the Moon 1934-7 by Paul Nash 1889-1946

 

paul-nash-blue-house-on-the-shore-1930

nash-searchlight-emplacement-2

 Concentrating on Nicholson  Spalding continues with her commentary on his abstraction.

” In !924 and 1929  Nicholson produced canvasses that appear to be entirely abstract but it was not until the 1930’s that he progressed logically through an investigation of Cubism to a pure and substained abstract style”. [9].

” Nicholson and Hepworth were also given an introduction to Piet Mondrian (De styll Movement and Neo Plasticism) by Lazlo Mohology-Nagy at the (Bahaus). the experience of this white painted studio and of Mondrian’s paintings (Neo Plasticism)”. [10].

Nicholson was impressed by the mirror images displayed in Mondrian’s studio .

” Fascinated by the mirror image Ben Nicholson frequently used it in the early 1930’s to further his interest in shifting depth and ambiguous planar relationships”. [11].

” His use of line shape and colour like the mirror  began to operate both as objects in their own rights and as illusion”. [12].

paul-nash-blue-house-on-the-shore-1930

876e697b39c93b3c161365d505d6f24a

web_duncan_grant_the_tub_circa_1913_tate_collection_photo__tate_london_2012

Nicholson was an idealist believing that freeing colour and form would lead to some form of abstract freedom.

” Nicholson believed that the liberation of form and colour achieved by abstract art paralleled or was linked to other forms of freedom”. [13].

 

” Hence the abstract works produced by Nicholson and Hepworth during the 1930’s have been seen to involve the very extinction of Englishness ( Whatever that means)”. [14]

” This opposition (Moore’s Figurative sculptures) has informed the post-war writing of both critics who accuse 20th century British artists of failing to match up to the bold avant-gardism of their continental or American Counterparts”.[15].

Barker in her essay comments on Unit 1 .

” At the same time Unit 1 needs to be seen as a strategic response to the difficult economic conditions in which artists found themselves in the early 1930’s”.[16].

untitled-ben-nicholson

mondrian_piet_4

The Last Voyage of Captain Cook 1936-67 by Sir Roland Penrose 1900-1984

Barker continues her comments about Nicholson and Hepworth during the 1930’s.

” During  the mid-1930’s Nicholson and Hepworth both spent time in France where they met and visited a number of Important artists including Pablo Picasso, Hans Arp ( who when  the Nazi’s invaded Paris would eventually move to the United States and have a very big influence on American art) Constantine Brancusi and Piet Mondrian”. [17].

” The growing commitment on the part of Nicholson and Hepworth to the practice of abstract art helped bring about the rapid demise of Unit 1″. [18].

This concludes my third part investigation into British art. in my concluding article I will deal with some of the social realists who emerged during the late 30’s like Percy Horton and Clive Branson and the influence of the Communist party on their work.

FOOTNOTES

  1. BRITISH ART SINCE 1900: FRANCES SPALDING .PG. 107
  2. DITTO.PG.107
  3. DITTO.PG.108
  4. DITTO.PG.108
  5. DITTO.PG.108
  6. DITTO.PG.109
  7. DITTO.PG.109
  8. DITTO.PG.109
  9. DITTO.PG.110
  10. DITTO.PG.110
  11. DITTO.PG.110
  12. DITTO.PG.110
  13. DITTO.PG.110-111
  14. ART OF THE AVANT-GARDES OPEN UNIVERSITY ABSTRACTION OF HEPWORTH AND NICHOLSON: EMMA BARKER . PG.273
  15. DITTO.PG.273
  16. DITTO.PG.275
  17. DITTO.PG.276
  18. DITTO.PG.276

 

One thought on “A HISTORICAL REVIEW OF BRITISH ART 1900-1940:PART 3.”

Leave a comment